Talk:Tameside/GA1

GA Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

Comments by Epicadam (talk · contribs):

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   Minor issues, mentioned below

   B. MoS compliance:

   remember: pictures and tables should not be left-aligned under section headers

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   GA pass. Well done.

Minor changes that I would make:

• "Since then the area has been administered by Tameside Borough Council, which has been judged by the Audit Commission to be "performing strongly"." Just remove this. It's unnecessary.
• "an earthwork" What's an earthwork?

Other than that, great work. -epicAdam^(talk) 02:39, 23 September 2008 (UTC)