Talk:Tamal Krishna Goswami

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Hinduism: Krishnaism High‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Krishnaism (assessed as High-importance).

Recent Edits

It's not vandalism to correctly label references. It's not vandalism to remove irrelevant links from the external links section and clean the external links section up. And finally it's not vandalism to remove the now much reduced (by your hands) section on Mohini-lila, as it's not particularly useful (we could write thousands of sections on every lecture series TKG ever gave). So please don't revert my edits and work in improving the article. Thanks Chopper Dave

In TKG's lectures on Bhagavata Purana (http://tkgtm.com/tapes/sb.htm) there are 7 lectures. The Mysterious Pastimes of Mohini-murti is a notable commentary on Bhagavata Purana. And hey, lighten up a bit. Thanks. Bhaktivonode

This Mohini-lila sections of this article references a notable teaching of TKG. Yet TKG aside, the inclusion of his commentary on Mohini-lila can also stands on it being the only known commentary (on Mohini-lila). For this reason alone it is notable!

This aside,the commentary's engagement of traditional gender views is exemplary of attitudes within orthodox Vaishnavism. Thanks. Bhaktivonode

I've moved the link to the newly created main article (The Mysterious Pastimes of Mohini-murti) into the See also section. It looks neater that way and none of the information is duplicated. Best wishes, ys, Gouranga(UK) 11:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. That was a constructive response. Thanks again. Bhaktivonode

Dear @GorgeCustersSabre:, would you mind explaining how using the IAST template (which italicises the Sanskrit, per MOS:FOREIGNITALIC) and bolding Tamala Krsna Maharaja's birth name (per MOS:BOLDSYN) is "not an improvement" on this article, please? Dāsānudāsa (talk) 12:57, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend Dāsānudāsa, please look at my partial self-revert. I hope you can live with it now. It’s because his original name need not be in bold. Please let me know your thoughts. All good wishes, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 13:33, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, George Custer's Sabre. But do you know if there is a manual of style somewhere specifically for this sort of thing? Specifically spiritual leaders' birth names? For example, on A. C. Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada's article, Abhay Charan De is in bold, so it would to have some consistency across the different ISKCON gurus, at least. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 14:04, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Dāsānudāsa, after reading your thoughts I’m now open to the idea of keeping a spiritual leader’s birth name in bold. I’ll self-revert. If I’m wrong too another editor will correct me anyway. Thank you for being patient with me. All the best, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 15:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All the best to you, too. And if anyone else has any thoughts on the issue, I'd love to hear them. Thanks, all! Dāsānudāsa (talk) 17:29, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]