Talk:Talvar (film)

Talvar (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 9, 2019. (Reviewed version).

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 18 October 2018.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Untitled

you have wrong informition about starcast of shruti tandan as not Avika gor its Alisha Parveen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamkarim (talk • contribs)

Feel free to add that with a source. utcursch | talk 13:56, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Talvar (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 04:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 04:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

"Produced by Bhardwaj and Vineet Jain, the film is based on the 2008 Noida double murder case involving a teenage girl and her family's servant. Starring Irrfan Khan, Konkona Sen Sharma and Neeraj Kabi, the film follows the investigation of a double-murder case of a girl and a servant from three different perspectives in which her parents are guilty or innocent of the murder charges." — You've already mentioned that its based on the double-murder case, so don't need to mention it a second time. Also, what are the three perspectives? A little bit summarising there is needed.
"Bhardwaj and Meghna did not obtain permission from the Talvar family for the film" — You mean "not yet" obtained permission as they approved the film afterwards.
"At a screening, lawyer and politician Ram Jethmalani, said that the trial depicted in the film inaccurate." — "in the film was inaccurate".
"Bhardwaj and Meghna researched the case for nearly two years, and found" — At what period of time. At a later paragraph you mention they "began researching the case in mid-2012, during the trial." So which one is correct? Just clarify this bit.

It started out in mid-2012 but when it was finished, I could not really find and which is why I didn't include it in the first place. Yashthepunisher (talk) 19:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Earlier entitled Nyodda, the film was renamed Talvar. The title was initially registered with Pritish Nandy Communications (PNC), but was purchased by Bhardwaj. PNC was the film's initial co-producer, but the company withdrew from the project." — You can move this up to right before "About the film's title, Meghna said that it referred to justice"
The surname of "Arushi Talvar" should be changed to "Talwar".
In the critical reception section, talk more about the technical aspects in one separate paragraph rather than just stating the same kind of thing about the film.

All reviews mostly talked about the film's treatment and performances, which I have tried to cover in the reviews, and not very much the technical aspects. Yashthepunisher (talk) 19:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In the critical reception section, there are lot of times where "called" and "calling" is repeated. Show some more variety.
Wikilink the names of the websites, magazines and newspapers on the first instances of them being mentioned.

That's about it from me, Yashthepunisher. Resolved my comments and the article is passed. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 15:26, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ssven2 The rest has been resolved. Thank you. Yashthepunisher (talk) 19:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
Pass or Fail:

Thank you for addressing my comments, Yashthepunisher. Congratulations, the article has passed. — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 03:52, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]