This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
Talli Osborne is within the scope of WikiProject Disability. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.DisabilityWikipedia:WikiProject DisabilityTemplate:WikiProject DisabilityDisability articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Punk music, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Punk musicWikipedia:WikiProject Punk musicTemplate:WikiProject Punk musicPunk music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2024. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
A fact from Talli Osborne appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Canadian punk rock musician Talli Osborne had only briefly spoken to the frontman of NOFX before the band wrote a song about her?
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Article is new and long enough, as it was moved to mainspace on 15 September. Earwig returns false positive based on large blockquote. Hook is supported by the Isador 2015 source in Vice. Hook length and interest is good, at 134 characters, however, if you are interested, you can go even shorter. Playing around with it, I was able to bring it down to 129 chars, but that's a personal preference. @Bridget: The only outstanding issue I can see here is the status of the claimed QPQ which was a procedural rejection of a duplicate hook that was already reviewed by another user. I'm not convinced this counts as a full review based on the QPQ requirements, but I'm open to discussion. It might help to submit another QPQ. Otherwise, with the QPQ status pending based on your response and the input of the community, we are almost good to go. Update: Another user has shared their input and says the QPQ qualifies, so I am passing it now. Good work. Viriditas (talk) 22:50, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Viriditas: thanks for taking the time to review this and get the clarification on the QPQ's eligibility! You shouldn't have had to do that – it would have be easier if I had just went ahead and did another review. I was putting in the effort that I would put in for a routine review before finding out it was a duplicate, which is why I ended up using it as a QPQ, but that's obviously not apparent in the review itself. Best, Bridget(talk)01:30, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The birth date is not good the way it is, because it looks as if she died at the age of 3. When you use "circa" it already means "about", and it's crazy to put this much complication for a single date.
For her dates, the entire thing should be (born c. 1980) – no extra date, nothing else. Or, if we know for sure it was either exactly 1978 or exactly 1981, we could put (born 1978 or 1981) – but without any c. TooManyFingers (talk) 04:11, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]