Talk:Taladas
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Taladas redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Category
[edit]Removed the category of Dragonlance, since it is suggested not to use both the subcategory and the main category at the same time. Also, the External Links should be merged with the References. -- ReyBrujo 00:22, 11 September 2005 (UTC)
Editing
[edit]I've managed to check out the blades of the tiger book from my library, so I'll be doing some work on this article. Just a heads up. ddcc 02:48, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
There are some slight discrepancies between "Blades of the Tiger" and "Time of the Dragon". For instance, the goblins of Northern Hosk are described as being extremely bloodthirsty in "Blades of the Tiger", which is not the case in "Time of the Dragon". Also, how the clerics of Hith would have managed to retain control over Thenol during the thirty years when they didn't have access to divine magic is left unexplained. It certainly seems unlikely ! RB, 07 August 2006
Magic
[edit]Do we know anything about arcane magic on Taladas? Chenhsi 05:28, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
From what I remember from the trilogy is there is no structured magic as on Ansalon. The major caster of the series is a spell thief and weaves the magic from the moons. There were also colored plinths that acted as a focus for casting. This is from memory so there may be descrepencies. I will re-read the trilogy over the week and see what I can do to help flesh this out. Eclecticvox 06:32, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Published Materials
[edit]I went ahead and added Shadows of the Flame to the published materials section. Eclecticvox 06:46, 30 October 2007 (UTC)
Gnomes
[edit]I've read many Dragonlance/Ansalon books. The gnomes there -are-, collectively, pretty dumb. (I know, citation needed, but this was brought up in the article as of this comment posting). Lots42 (talk) 23:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)