Talk:Takva: A Man's Fear of God

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plot

"This article's plot summary may be too long or excessively detailed."

I didn't write this summary, but fail to see how it could be considered too long or detailed. I've recently watched the film, and I think the article summarises the plot very well indeed. This is a film with many nuances, and a much shorter summary would not do it justice. 77.44.110.91 (talk) 18:07, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

After several years an editor removed the tag[1] claiming "plot is fine." The plot section was really not the best, this was a classic mistake of confusing "fine" "adequate" or "good enough" with actually good quality. Ideally this is supposed to be a Plot summary good enough to be included in an encyclopedia, not merely the bare minimum needed for readers to understand the premise. The Plot section was certainly not good enough to reach that higher standard and badly in need of improvement.

WP:FILMPLOT recommends 400-700 words. The plot section was clearly within that limit, length was not the problem. "may be too long or excessively detailed" The detail was the problem, more specificallythe commentary, and speculation about the characters motivations and state of mind was the problem. That's not plot, that is opinion which is subjective and original research.

I have trimmed back the plot section. (See also WP:STREAMLINE.) More detail about what actually happens could be added but please do not add commentary again. If you can find reliable sources that provide commentary then it could be added to the Reception section, but do not make up your own commentary. -- 109.79.67.41 (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Takva: A Man's Fear of God. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080926200107/http://oscars.movies.yahoo.com:80/news/iw/20071018/1355.html to http://oscars.movies.yahoo.com/news/iw/20071018/1355.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:34, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]