Talk:Taken by Force (book)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Historiography / North America / United States / World War II B‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

B

This article has been rated as B-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military historiography task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Reliable source

This article, as the book, contains some very strong statements and as such requires secondary reliable sources to verify them, per WP:V. Including the book itself (a primary source) in the "Further reading" section does not constitute adequate sourcing. Of the three "external links" two of them appeared completely irrelevant before the recent clarification. Furthermore, the first one is a newspaper editorial, hence not considered reliably Wikipedia standards, while the second does not mention either the book or its author.radek (talk) 20:11, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've expanded a bit, found a second review, added an infobox (eliminating the "further reading" section) and put in a brief synopsis. I'll be using the Drayton reference as well. One thing I'm noticing from that article is apparently the publication history goes back to 2001, not 2007. One thing I would very much like to see would be the Morrow review, of which I've only got maybe 20 words from the preview - if anyone can get me a pdf I'd be grateful. I've attributed where I think it was appropriate, and the book does seem notable. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 15:24, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]