Talk:Tajikistan at the 2002 Winter Olympics

Tajikistan at the 2002 Winter Olympics has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 2, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Tajikistan Low‑importance

	Tajikistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tajikistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tajikistan-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TajikistanWikipedia:WikiProject TajikistanTemplate:WikiProject TajikistanTajikistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Olympics Low‑importance

	Olympic Games portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tajikistan at the 2002 Winter Olympics/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nova Crystallis (talk · contribs) 00:27, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing later. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 00:27, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"debut here in Salt Lake City." Sounds better to replace it with "debut in these Games."
Alpine skiing should be linked somewhere.
- Done.
Who was the closing ceremony flag bearer.
- Dont know. The only list I have mysteriously cuts off after India Courcelles (talk) 19:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"super-G, held on" Remove comma.
"finish the run" The first one
- Super G only has one run. Courcelles (talk) 19:14, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"and went unclassified" Maybe "and therefore unclassified"?
- Done. Courcelles (talk) 19:20, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a few things. Nova Crystallis (Talk) 19:04, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- THINK THATS EVERYTHING, though no promises working on a tiny phone. Courcelles (talk) 19:22, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]