Talk:Taiwan Strait Tunnel Project

This article was nominated for deletion on 16 May 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of bridges and tunnels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Bridges and TunnelsWikipedia:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsTemplate:WikiProject Bridges and TunnelsBridge and Tunnel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan Low‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aggressive Military Use?

I don't really understand why "the tunnel's potential for aggressive military use remains a concern to Taiwan" because if anyone tried to attack the other side through the tunnel, all the defending side had to do is just closing the tunnel, then the attacking side would have no way to run. Has anyone heard about attacks through a undersea tunnel before? This kind of concern seems just ridiculous to me. DerekJoe 07:03, 29 December 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Derekjoe (talk • contribs)

Agreed, this bit does seem I bit silly. I'll try a rewrite see if it sticks.Zeonglow (talk) 19:17, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no sources

This article is sourced by two 404s. If this is merely a proposal thrown out there, and one not taken seriously at that, then maybe it does not yet deserve an article... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.14.173.51 (talk) 00:15, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion it is not a reason to kill an articel just because is sourced by 404s. The better method would be to find actual material to the topic and improve the article. There is enough material around, just google for the titel of the article.--Pechristener (talk) 07:30, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]