Talk:Taikun

Japan: Culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 08:52, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Culture task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Comments

Although the word was deleted and redirected to Tycoon entry (without the 5-day waiting period), I don't believe this is called for.

1)The word is notable as one of only a handful of Japanese words not specifically related to Japanese culture to have entered the Japanese language. 2) The fact that the word is no longer used in Japanese is not relevant; the entry specifically states that the word is archaic. It is not intended as a dictionary definition but as a word of interest to speakers of the English language. 3) Redirecting to "mogul" entry serves no purpose; no one would ever look for information on tycoon by searching "taikun." --JSLR 02:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Why Taikun?

"As Shogun, he certainly could not call himself Emperor..." So why not just "Shogun"? The word was no more obscure to foreign states than "taikun", surely? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.100.108.140 (talk) 01:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Two issues with this article:

Is it an article in its own right, or could we merge it with shogun?

Surely "tycoon" is the normal spelling in English, first time I have come across this spelling. PatGallacher (talk) 19:29, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]