Talk:Taff's Well Thermal Spring
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
pdf reference
[edit]stumbled onto this which I don't think has been used and seems to have some interesting content. EdwardLane (talk) 13:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
- It looks to be a well-researched magazine article in Natur Cymru magazine, with the pdf hosted on the Natural Environment Research Council website. Seems very useful, particularly the "first recorded visit in 1760" and "no evidence to support Roman usage". Sionk (talk) 14:05, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Oxford spelling?
[edit]This article is hardly "written with Oxford spelling"; it uses "utilise" and "realised" elsewhere for a start. What appears to have happened is that this diff introduced content from a paper which did use Oxford spelling (e.g. "generalize"). However, that shouldn't have happened as the article was originally written in British English - it is an error we should correct, not a choice of English style for the article.
This is not an article linked to the OUP or a particularly academic article, and I can't see any reason for it to use Oxford spelling. I would strongly suggest fixing the typo and tagging as British English. Vashti (talk) 04:30, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- Nobody? Okay, WP:BOLD. Vashti (talk) 14:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)