Talk:Tadeusz Banachiewicz

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Physics: Biographies Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

File:Tadeusz Banachiewicz.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Tadeusz Banachiewicz.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Tadeusz Banachiewicz.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:03, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Another picture

Current photo has a bad quality and it is from his grave. It is much better to have his "real life" photo. I would do it myself, but I don't understand copy-right stuff. Nochyyy (talk) 15:43, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's not from the grave. --CiaPan (talk) 20:40, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is a lot of his real pictures, I believe it is better to use them, we can include current photo as an extra image in the text. If you could do it, I would be grateful. I mean pictures like this: [1], [2] and [3]. There is only one issue of copy-right. Nochyyy (talk) 07:01, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Nochyyy: Yes, I realize there are portraits of T.Banachiewicz in the Internet. I know many of them. However there is an important problem: they are not clearly copyright-free. Some of them are still under copyright protection, many have copyright status undefined or unclear, and we are not allowed to use them.
That was also the case with 'File:Tadeusz Banachiewicz.jpg' which once was in the article – see the note above (the note was here until you deleted it, now I restored it) and a relevant discussion at Commons (c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tadeusz Banachiewicz.jpg). --CiaPan (talk) 07:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are polish and many of this pictures come from polish sources, one of them is this paper [4] which claims that these photos are from "Private collection of Jerzy M. Kreiner; published, respectively, in: Zawada 2004, p. 23; Strzałkowski 2012, p. 2; Koroński 2015, p. 21)". So, if you can email these people or Krakow university and ask for the permission of using these pictures on his Wikipedia page, that would be great, they should be collaborative. Nochyyy (talk) 07:42, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]