Talk:Tactical Intelligence

This just a generalized overview of what can be verified by open-source Army Field Manuals and actual particpation in both actual staff work and collection/analysis at different levels.

Please bear in mind that collection and technical capabilities are tightly held secrets, so I won't go into much detail.Radical man 7 18:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not start lines with spaces. They will not format properly. Also, articles here are not signed, per our Ownership policy. Fan-1967 18:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

The first sentences in sections 2, 3, and 3.1 start with the words "this" and "these" in an incorrect way. (Headings are not part of the text, so "this," etc., doesn't refer to them but to whatever came before in the text.)

216.1.16.126 (talk) 20:38, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

C&P / copyvio?

This article reads to me like a C&P, especially considering some of the formatting issues that were present previously. Even if it's from an open-source manual (in which case, the source should be referenced), it could use some rewriting by someone who knows the topic. -- Avocado (talk) 22:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

redirect

I'm going to go ahead and WP:BB and redirect this page to Military_intelligence#Tactical_intelligence. This page has been unsourced for a substantial period of time, contains little information not already contained on the other page, and what little information it does contain that's not elsewhere is americentric (in addition to being unsourced.) RV if you have a problem with it, or intend to improve this article. Kevin (talk) 09:47, 1 May 2011 (UTC)