Talk:Tactical Autonomous Combatant

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Military history: North America / United States

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Robotics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics articles

Comments

original research, delete this sci fi fairy shit

I Deproded it, rewrote it, sourced it, and stubbed it. This is an actual inititive the military is working on, though the way it was written was pure WP:CRYSTAL. It might still warrent deletion as a neologism if anyone wants to take it to AfD. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Isotope23 (talk • contribs) 18:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

The USJFCOM article seems to establish it as a has-been-really-a-thought. But (frustration) the article is not dated, and refers to autonomous robots "as early as 2005" - so it's clearly written considerably before that date. Can you think of any way to date it? --Alvestrand 09:34, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The linked article is gone, the page has not been usefully edited for more than an year, I don't think anybody is interested in this... Ansh666 (talk) 18:05, 30 March 2009 (UTC) oh, and WP:NOR Ansh666 (talk) 05:26, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

Note to admin: while the article had been PROD'ed before (which I somehow didn't notice), it was a fundamentally different article back then. Does this still count, or should it be taken to AfD? Ansh666 05:07, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]