Talk:Tabajara

Brazil Mid‑importance

	Brazil portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Brazil and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indigenous peoples of the Americas

	Indigenous peoples of the Americas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the Americas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indigenous peoples of the Americas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of the AmericasWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of the AmericasIndigenous peoples of the Americas articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Invalid references

The given references to José de Alencar's 1865 novel Iracema are incomplete (no page numbers), as well as not being properly formed references including publisher, ISBN, etc. The text was taken from a Google book preview. Worst of all, Iracema is a work of fiction - we don't know how much of it is interpolated, and how much is historical fact. Unless the book itself is footnoted, and those references can be found, read, verified, translated and pulled into the article, the article as it stands is unsourced. I've deleted the improper references.Sbalfour (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

moving article

Tabajara people is not a good search term: users are likely looking for things like: Tabajara Indians, Indigenous people, Brazilian Indians, Amerindians, etc. In addition, usable sources refer to the Tabajaras as "indians". "People" is generic, when a more specific term is available. So moving page.Sbalfour (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your move because you announced it then immediately moved it without discussion. The word "Indians" is capitalized in English, so "Tabajara indians" isn't going to fly. "People" is the preferred term for ethnic groups on Wikipedia. I'm personally not against using the term "Indians" in article titles but unfortunately many others are, so it's a guarantee that someone else would make a unilateral term back to "people" sooner or later, e.g. [1], [2], [3], etc. -Uyvsdi (talk) 00:22, 20 January 2014 (UTC)Uyvsdi[reply]