Talk:T pad

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Pads (L-pads, T-pads, pi-pads, et.al.) are also used for AC signals in the AF (audio) range and are not limited to RF applications. This article appears to be too narowly scoped.

"Impedance and loss section " and "Resistor values" section seem to have a circular definition.

It looks to me like : $\gamma _{\mathrm {T} },\$ is used to compute R1 and R2 in the Resistor values section, but it is defined in the Impedance and loss section in terms of R1 and R2. It looks like a circular definition to me. There is probably something simple that I am failing to grasp, or maybe something that is obvious to the experts that did not get written down. Could some provide a numerical example like generating the component values for a 16dB pad that matches 100 ohms to 135 ohms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Constant314 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Its definition is the natural log of the loss. It can be computed from the R values, or the R values can be computed from it. This is not circular, and not a definition, just some relationships. The relationships given appear to be limited to the case of symmetrical T pads, with equal input and output impedances, so your example can't be work with these formulae. Some generalization would be in order... Dicklyon (talk) 02:01, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hyphen in title?

Sources aren't consistent, but the hyphen makes no sense. How about we change it to just T pad, parallel to L pad? Dicklyon (talk) 02:13, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]