A fact from TV Guide's 100 Greatest Episodes of All-Time appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 April 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
06:11, 18 August 2011 Zscout370 (talk | contribs) deleted page TV Guide's 100 Greatest Episodes of All Time (Expired PROD, concern was: copyvio list)
05:36, 5 September 2010 Jclemens (talk | contribs) deleted page TV Guide's 100 Greatest Episodes of All Time (Expired PROD, concern was: This is a list based solely on an article by TV Guide, which is not even cited on the page.)--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:31, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
@Woodensuperman I'm not sure saying that having a list of 100 episodes in an article about those same 100 episodes is WP:INDISCRIMINATE or WP:LISTCRUFT. This isn't a general article about TV Guide or a general article about top x lists. If you think the list is not notable (and it might be), then nominiate the article. But if the subject itself is notable, then having the list is completely part of the article. Gonnym (talk) 11:33, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]