Talk:TV Everywhere/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 21:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Performed these copy edits; dupdet spotchecks return no bulk close paraphrasing.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
Please remember to include relevant bibliographical information in your citations.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
I've added this logo; I think it oughta make things look spiffy.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Specific

Per WP:LEADLENGTH, the lead should be one or two paragraphs.
Some direct quotes require citations directly afterwards (WP:MINREF); I've tagged them using {{citation needed}}.

That's pretty much it, I think. Nice work (again). Hold for a fortnight. 23W 01:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]