Talk:TPS Pakistan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TPS Pakistan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 September 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This company is one of the few in Pakistan that employs a considerable number of software engineers and architects who are day in and day out working on newer concepts in ebanking technology. The company is credited with setting up ebanking infrastructure of pakistan. I strongly feel that a small page be dedicated to this company as it is from a country that is in turmoil, yet this company and its employees are making waves across the globe.
The article has no mention of any particular product line or any unique features, it just shows how and when the company was created and where does it stand right now. This is not a blatant marketing material as it was written, if it were a blatant marketing material it would have had the details about the products and the clientele etc. Which it does not at the moment.
This company is one of the largest and the best source of income via foreign remittances for pakistan and hence its mention in the history books and the encyclopedia like this one is necessary. (Hariswaheed (talk) 11:23, 18 November 2010 (UTC))
- Are you serious? This article is clearly marketing material, just read it!
- In this case, however, the problem is not with the tone of the article, but with the notability of the subject. The article gives no reason to believe that this company is important to anyone outside of it. It needs to assert a reason for the subject being notable, even if that reason is not sourced. Also, please sign your posts. You may also want to look at our policy on conflict of interest. --NYKevin @228, i.e. 04:27, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
I have kept the article very neutral, but if you still think it is marketing material i will re-write it and also point out the significance of this company. Just give me a day. (Hariswaheed (talk) 11:08, 18 November 2010 (UTC))
I have written the facts that make this company significant, what is the difference between this article and the ones that are placed for First Data or Euronet Worldwide for that matter. Why are you targeting this page and not those pages? (Hariswaheed (talk) 18:24, 18 November 2010 (UTC))