Talk:TPB AFK

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.

Requested move 13 January 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved per consensus (non-admin closure) Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 15:23, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

TPB AFK → TPB AFK: The Pirate Bay Away From Keyboard – "TPB AFK: The Pirate Bay Away From Keyboard" is the documentary's official title, so it only makes sense to have the article be named after the official title. 90.232.66.157 (talk) 18:27, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Move proposed above goes against WP:COMMONAME, WP:OFFICIALNAME, WP:CONCISE, WP:PRECISE and MOS:SUBTITLE Vycl1994 (talk) 19:34, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Should we move Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith to Star Wars: Episode III, then? -90.232.66.157 (talk) 19:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)#[reply]
- No, because it is actually most often referred to with the subtitle (even often referred to by the subtitle, without the first part). That's not the case here. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:10, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Vycl1994: queried move request Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC) —Relisting. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSA^talk 07:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:CONCISE. We don't have a principle to use the longest possible title for a work (and a policy to prefer the short, when there's not a WP:RECOGNIZABLE problem in doing so). Unless there's a good reason not to, we use the most common name found in reliable sources, and we don't add on subtitles unnecessarily. (MOS:SUBTITLE). I don't see any evidence that the long version is the WP:COMMONNAME. That said, I also don't see a WP:PRECISE argument to make against it, other than perhaps that we need not be any more precise than is actually necessary. It's correct that whether it's "official" or not is meaningless on Wikipedia. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 11:10, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.