Talk:TOWeb
Appearance
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Sources
[edit]Sources should be WP:RS as well as making specific statements that support the statement to which they are attached:
- Tucows link] is not a review - all of the text is copied verbatim from the developer's website. Criteria for Tucows ratings isn't clear - seems to be user-supplied. So it's not WP:RS. Moreover, it is used to support a statement about the design of the program.
- SnapFiles describes this product, does not actually review it (no pros/cons).
- CNet link is not a review by an established, knowledgeable reviewer, but rather by an anonymous user. TEDickey (talk) 12:27, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
Categories:
- Unassessed software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Unassessed Websites articles
- Unknown-importance Websites articles
- Unassessed Websites articles of Unknown-importance
- All Websites articles