Jump to content

Talk:TNT Sports (United Kingdom)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:IINFO

[edit]

As explained in the policy introduction, merely being true, or even verifiable, does not automatically make something suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. To provide encyclopedic value, data should be put in context with explanations referenced to independent sources. Wikipedia articles should not be:

  1. Summary-only descriptions of works. Wikipedia treats fiction in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the reception and significance of notable works in addition to a concise summary. For more information regarding plot summaries, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction)#Plot summaries. Similarly, articles on works of non-fiction, including documentaries, research books and papers, religious texts, and the like, should contain more than a recap or summary of the works' contents. Such articles should be expanded to have broader coverage.
  2. Lyrics databases. An article about a song should provide information about authorship, date of publication, social impact, and so on. Quotations from a song should be kept to a reasonable length relative to the rest of the article, and used to facilitate discussion, or to illustrate the style; the full text can be put on Wikisource and linked to from the article. Most song lyrics published after 1922 are protected by copyright, and any quotation of them must be kept to a minimum, and used for the purpose of direct commentary or to illustrate some aspect of the style. Never link to the lyrics of copyrighted songs unless the site linked to clearly has the right to distribute the work. See Wikipedia:Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources for full discussion.
  3. Excessive listings of statistics. Long and sprawling lists of statistics may be confusing to readers and reduce the readability and neatness of our articles. In addition, articles should contain sufficient explanatory text to put statistics within the article in their proper context for a general reader. In cases where this may be necessary, (e.g. Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2012), consider using tables to enhance the readability of lengthy data lists. Where it is not necessary, as in the main article United States presidential election, 2012, omit excess statistics altogether and summarize any necessary data concisely.
  4. Exhaustive logs of software updates. Use reliable third-party (not self-published or official) in articles dealing with software updates to describe the versions listed or discussed in the article. Common sense must be applied with regard to the level of detail to be included.


None of the above would seem to apply to this article, though. Bonusballs (talk) 21:24, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Endless lists of presenters and television ratings and magazine shows is exactly what WP:IINFO is designed to avoid. There's a whole section devoted to what television rights BT Sport has, despite it already being covered elsewhere. RealDealBillMcNeal (talk) 00:13, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on BT Sport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:25, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Anybody got a link for the new logo as updated in May 2018? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.136.21.7 (talk) 11:59, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Split the programming

[edit]

I think there's a lot too much navigate at once. The programming (and possibly the coverage) could be separate articles in order maintain focus the BT Sports channel group as a whole. MegaSmike46 (talk) 17:08, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TNT Sports page name

[edit]

Opening up the floor to suggestions of a name for this page once the name change takes next week. My suggestion is TNT Sports (United Kingdom and Ireland)). This is the distinguish it from the ambiguous TNT Sports Steven a91 (talk) 12:15, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:TNT_Sports_(United_Kingdom)&oldid=1263024779"