Talk:TFI International

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: Quebec Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Montreal Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Transport Mid‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trucks Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

many of north america's trucking companies are private so it's hard to find recent data on a lot of them

it's clear from the most recent data lists on American trucking companies that, transforce ranks a lot higher than it did in 2005. the extra information in brackets was put there to give people a better understanding of where transforce actually ranks among companies today. I just don't want someone coming by and putting a template for news release at the top of the page because of something like that it takes a while to get it taken down after it goes up.Grmike (talk) 09:42, 26 April 2010 (UTC)grmike[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on TransForce. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100330151128/http://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/336066-Top_50_Trucking_Companies_Special_Report_Excellence_in_Motion.php to http://www.logisticsmgmt.com/article/336066-Top_50_Trucking_Companies_Special_Report_Excellence_in_Motion.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:40, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In need of cleanup

Most of the article is comprised of lists or numbers without cohesive structure. Highest priority would probably to rewrite the lead which starts fine but fails to adequately summarize the company. Following that, the Operations (which may or may not need to merged with "Business segments and divisions") likely needs significant help. Given the pace at which TFI has expanded especially in the past 5-10 years its not surprising but it now is the parent of a whole lot of notable logistics/transportation companies and this article doesn't currently do a great job to expose that fact. I've done some restructuring and updating but there's quite a bit to do. - DatraxMada (talk) 22:43, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think we've got an issue here with the Business segments and divisions section violating WP:NOTADIRECTORY. My edits to that section so far have just been to reformat and update the lists that were already there. It's probably more appropriate to rewrite that section as prose perhaps in more of a glossary-type layout and only mention specific notable subsidiaries in each section. Open to feedback, though. --DatraxMada (talk) 13:48, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]