Talk:Szombathely

Hungary Low‑importance

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Comments

During the World War 2, as with many other towns in the region, Szombathely became a target due to the railway, junction, marshalling yards, local aerodrome, and barracks. The town therefore formed part of the logistical military infrastructure supporting Axis forces. The town and locality was attacked by day on several occasions in 1944 and 1945 by aircraft of the US 15th Air Force, which also included aircraft from the Royal Air Force 205 Group which made their attacks by night. These aircraft operated from bases in Italy.

http://natureonline.com/37/9-wimpys.html http://www.frankambrose.com/pages/15th.html http://www.usaaf.net/chron/44/dec44.htm http://www.milhist.net/usaaf/mto44b.html

On 28 March 1945 the German 6th SS Panzer and 6th Armies were pushed back by an assault across the Raba River by the 46th and 26th Armies of the USSR 3rd Ukranian Front. Szombathely was occupied on 29 March 1945.

http://eng.9may.ru/01.04.1945/eng_inform/m9004219

The article's WW2 history section needs enhancing, and I propose some of the above be included. It would be interesting for anyone to state how many people were killed/injured in the raids and the damage done. This would also quantify the statment "the 5th most damaged city". Branston Pickle 16:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As no further information forthcoming the above inserted, but paragraph of WW2 still needs to be quantified with accurate casulaty figures and damage.Sidney Bung 21:11, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is unlikely that local Jews referred to their settlements as "shtetl." That is a Yiddish term popularized by American Jews and was used in historical Galicia and the Russian Empire. The Jews of Szombathely probably did not speak Yiddish, at least not after the 17th century - the use of "shtetl" needs sources. However, I am not sure - does anyone know? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ikalmar (talk • contribs) 17:16, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

mi Principe y Rey?

Quien ES ???:):):) Gloriaromanmaciashernandez (talk) 21:42, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Szombathely. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20140628105157/http://nif.hu/hu/hirek/Megindult_a_forgalom_az_uj_Szombathely-Vat_szakaszon to http://nif.hu/hu/hirek/Megindult_a_forgalom_az_uj_Szombathely-Vat_szakaszon

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:17, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]