Talk:Systime Computers/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: SurenGrig07 (talk · contribs) 17:48, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Following an immediate inspection of the internal contents of the provided article, in particular the generalised sectional prose and individual organisation of the article itself, in addition to a cursory viewing of the references and citations sectors of the article, I primarily believe that this article qualifies for immediate selection as a good article; this primarily remains due to the fact that the aforementioned article satisfies the entirety of the good article criteria, the satisfaction of which necessitates selection. With regards to the first criterion, the article primarily possesses large quantities of satisfactory prose, with the interior of the article containing an apparent absence of large grammatical errors despite the necessity of minor instances of advanced copy editing within particular regions of the article; the layout of the article primarily conforms to the guidelines established within the Manual of Style concerning the provision of citations within a short citation format, while the "External links" section additionally conforms to established procedures. Concerning the second criterion, the article possesses extensive quantities of citations, which, upon inspection, originate within their entirety from verifiable sources; an apparent absence of original research exists within the article and no plagiarism remains established or disputed, while the "References" section, as previously referenced, primarily utilises the established short citation style. The article remains particularly broad within its coverage, addressing numerous individual aspects of the topic and primarily establishing a particularly satisfactory analysis of the history of the corporation which remains the subject of the article; the individual components of the article contain large quantities of detail concerning the products sold via the corporation, the individuals or groups responsible for utilising them and the ultimate decline of the corporation. However, as an additional recommendation of improvement to the individual responsible for nominating the article, I would recommend further expansion of the article summary; in particular, information from the "Transformations" and "Dissolution and fates" sections would remain welcome within the introduction. Returning to the criteria, following an immediate inspection of the recent edit history of the article, no edit wars or extensive disputes remain apparent; the entirety of the edits to the article within recent history remain constructive, providing additional information or completing copy editing. Lastly, however, the article possesses adequate quantities of illustration and images, with suitable, albeit inconsistent, captions provided for the entirety of the images within the article; however, as a further component of improvement, I would recommend the removal of the border fortification image within the "Cold War" section and its replacement with a relevant image. Thus, I would primarily like to announce that the provided article qualifies for immediate selection as a good article, in accordance with the good article criteria; thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SurenGrig07 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]