Talk:System File Checker

Microsoft Windows: Computing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft Windows, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Microsoft Windows on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Microsoft WindowsWikipedia:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsTemplate:WikiProject Microsoft WindowsMicrosoft Windows articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

System File Protection

I have checked the citation [1], and there is no "System File Protection" or "SFP" words on the page. System File Protection in ME cannot have been replaced by Windows File Protection in 2000 since 2000 is older. However, SFP was replaced by WFP when XP was released - not when 2000 was released. There is nothing relevant about that in the reference. It is just a description of the feature, and I already know that. ONEtryout 10:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see what you mean. I thought you changed because WFP did not exist in W2K. The wording is ambitious given W2k precedes WinME. --Voidvector 16:04, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"given W2k precedes WinME" -- yeah but win2k is NT based, ME is DOS based, its not a valid comparison. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.16.160.17 (talk) 14:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:System File Checker running on Windows 98.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:System File Checker running on Windows 98.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 10 May 2012

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:System File Checker running on Windows 98.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SFC dependencies?

I know, not a forum, etc but I think it would be useful to have in the article.

Does anyone know SFC's dependencies? I tried using a batch file earlier to change the extension of files in a folder, and apparently it only works on the current folder, not the folder it's run from, and it renamed system files, including some of SFCs dlls, and renaming the few files to get sfc working is wayyyy easier than manually renaming thousands of files this damn script messed up. Bumblebritches57 (talk) 10:29, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Corrupted system files

Article currently mentions:

It offered scanning and restoration of corrupted system files

Would be educational to add a section to the article explaining why Microsoft (R) Windows (R) allows its system files to get corrupted in the first place. In other words, why does this fixer tool even need to exist? 72.208.150.248 (talk) 18:00, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]