Talk:sysfs

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sysfs article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux Low‑importance

	Linux portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

ramfs

ramfs redirects here, but is not really explained in the article. -- Beland 21:11, 7 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sysfs is built upon ramfs but has per se nothing to do with ramfs itself. ramfs is a kind of tmpfs without size limits. Documentation can be found here for example. 83.77.133.173 (talk) 13:36, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's safe to say that ramfs needs its own article. Redirecting from ramfs to something totally unrelated and specific to Linux only, is not helpful. 202.164.192.231 (talk) 11:27, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected ramfs to tmpfs#Linux because they're pretty much the same thing on Linux. -- intgr [talk] 11:11, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mount point

Is sysfs always mounted to /sys? --Abdull (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

/sys vs /proc/sys

I'd say this page can bring confusion between /sys and /proc/sys. /proc/sys should be the one to be compared to sysctl, not /sys. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.223.3.27 (talk) 07:01, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ongoing edit war

@Mfwitten and Dsimic: Please solve your disagreements in a discussion format instead of an edit war. -- intgr [talk] 08:34, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Well, I already gave up so it's no longer an edit war. I have better things to do both here and in my life than to debate over the WP:SEEALSO guideline. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 09:01, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]