Talk:Synthetic gemstone

Gemology and Jewelry: Gemstones Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Gemology and Jewelry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Gemology and Jewelry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Gemology and JewelryWikipedia:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryTemplate:WikiProject Gemology and JewelryGemology and Jewelry articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Gemstones subpage.

Untitled

This article, particularly the section on diamonds, needs to be re-evaluated and updated. There are currently two companies in the US producing gem-quality artificial diamonds in multi-carat sizes. One company, Gemesis, is based in Florida. The other, is a Boston company named Apollo.

Carbon dating

If people can make something that looks millions of years old in a few days how do we know the earth is as old as scientists say? Artificial things can be made to look billions of years old under microscopes.

Name change

Synthetic gemstones would be a more appropriate NPOV name for this article. Artificial denotes lack of value, whereas many synthetics have value. I am going to move article in near future SauliH 02:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. --moof 07:59, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The so-called "sophisticated synthetics" are not inexpensive, e.g., Chatham (laboratory-created) emeralds. T.E. Goodwin 01:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Structure for the article

I. History

II. Technology

Corundums

Flame-Pull
Hydrothermal

Diamond

Impact
(what technique does apollo/gemesis use?)

Others

Beryl
pearl <--- do cultured pearls count as "synthetic"?
Opal

III. Commerce

reaction from gemological industry
consumer reaction
valuation
industrial uses

I'd like to see this article grow. I've read the Wired article on Gemesis and Apollo and done some pedestrian research on the web, but I'm no expert. Hopefully, the outline above can inspire people to write a section or two. :)

Wellspring 18:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Synthetic gemstone/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

*Expansion, Expansion, Expansion!

This is a head article for information regarding numerous synthetic gemstones, Manufacturers, manufacturing processes, and the culture related to natural vs synthetic
Synthetic diamond as a subset of Synthetic gemstone, or mere sister/related article? ie should this article cover the diamond subject?
For that matter - explanation of nomenclature and the debate about terminology may fit in this article - cultured diamonds/synthetic diamonds, cultured pearls?, simulant/sythetic. Fake, artificial etc etc etc?
Key seperation tools/methodology/equipment of gemology/mineralogy for determining natural/synthetic

SauliH 03:01, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 03:01, 2 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 07:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)