Talk:Synthetic Organism Designer

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Article was marked for deletion for the following reason: "If this is truly specific to one team, then this is not encyclopedic. With only this definition, it appears to be a neologism."

I disagree with this. From what I understand from the article about avoiding neologigism:

> Neologisms are words and terms that have recently been coined, > generally do not appear in any dictionary, but may be used widely or within certain communities.

This is a piece of software, not a "word" or "term". It also does not refer to a "type of software"; it's about 1 specific program. The source I gave even shows a version number (1.0).

> The use of neologisms should be avoided in Wikipedia articles because > they are not well understood, are not clearly definable, and will > have different meanings to different people.

I think that with a bit of searching and asking the right people, this piece of software can be quite well understood, clearly defined and have a single meaning.

It depends on how secret / proprietary the technology is. But you can't know that without doing some research first.

I recommend keeping this article, at least until someone can prove that the software does not exist or is and always will be top secret.

Maybe the proof lies on the author of the article, to prove that the software exist. And not the other way around. I think this article should be deleted, unless you or someone provides us with a download link, a code repository, or similar. To me, this sounds like a PR stunt more than anything else. · · · Omnissiahs hierophant (talk) 15:24, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

What I'd like to know is if Craig Venter intends to release this as a product. If so, whether it's going to be an open source or not.

Given the pace at which synthesizing genomes is moving along, that's not an irrelevant question. Something like this could be available in any modestly funded lab within a few years. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sjors (talk • contribs) 20:03, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]