Talk:Synchronicity (film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Science Fiction Low‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The 49%/99% ownership question

Meisner implies during his conversation with Jim early in the movie that he already owns 50% of the technology. He seems to blackmail Jim for an additional 49%, making Meisner's potential ownership 99%. But the dialogue is somewhat unclear. Jestertrek (talk) 17:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just watched the movie. Following the first test, Meisner wants 50% ownership in exchange for the funding for the second test. Jim negotiates it down to 49%. Later, he blackmails Jim the day before the second test for an additional 50%. 96.234.184.32 (talk) 02:24, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Plot description inaccurate

Future Jim does not see "visions" at all.

He is also explicitly shown as dead in the Grand Hotel following the (second) second experiment.

The healthy Jim who shows up in the ending is Jim Prime, who arrived in a parallel dimension in which he was already dead from an explosion. Without another Jim in that dimension, he wouldn't wither away. 96.234.184.32 (talk) 02:27, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]