Talk:Syeda Ghulam Fatima

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Syeda Ghulam Fatima article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Pakistan Low‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why was there a detailed account of one journalist's issue with the person in question?

Half of Fatima's page was dedicated to an article written by a journalist who did not support the human rights work Fatima was doing. This is biased information that doesn't belong in a Wiki article.

67.82.172.191 (talk) 15:51, 27 January 2018 (UTC)milkywayuser[reply]

The central reason she merits an entry on Wikipedia is her work on bonded labor. The journalist (who presented pictures and other various documents) calls that work into question: it may be a scam. This information clearly belongs on the page.

That the journalist may not support her work is a straw man. Just because the journalist does not support the work does not make the pictures & documentation cease to exist. Outright asserting that the journalist is biased (and therefore the reporting invalid) is unjustified. Where are the articles that show the output of her work? Where are the pictures of the structures that have been built, the cases that have been resolved? When that information and reporting appears, then that information should be ADDED to the page, showing that the allegations were debunked.

Torsionalmetric (talk) 16:44, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No pictures or documentation were included in the citations. Only an article making claims with no evidence to back them up.

67.82.172.191 (talk) 14:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)milkywayuser[reply]