Talk:Sydney society for conservation biology
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Sydney society for conservation biology redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Response
[edit]In response to some issues, the following editions have now been implemented: There are more references to the statements made in the article. There is now a clear "lead section" and adheres to the layout guidelines. Further secondary sources are being added to establish notability (in progress). The article "Society for Conservation Biology" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Society_for_conservation_biology) links to this page under it's "Chapter" heading with a reference to the "Sydney Chapter",so it should no longer be marked as an "orphan" article.
- Thank you so very Much i appreciate it. Crown Prince Talk 09:09, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback and editing! One issue refers to potentially unreliable. Which references do you deem to be unreliable? Also, which parts do you think require further references? ConservationaustraliaConservationaustralia (talk) 13:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)