Talk:Sydney siege inquest

Next session

The article currently finishes with a summary of the evidence heard on 3 June. There's no indication as to when the next session will be held, or even if there is to be one. For all the reader knows, the inquest has been terminated and the page isn't up to date. Might I suggest that, whenever a break is scheduled, a brief announcement of the next session's date be appended. Alternatively, create a new section titled with the scheduled date, containing only the sentence, "Hearing will resume on this date." Akld guy (talk) 04:31, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Dentition

"The DPP solicitor said there was no new evidence to support a dentition application..." Is it true that he wanted to get Monis' teeth fixed, or should that be 'detention'? Akld guy (talk) 08:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Sydney siege inquest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151222143731/http://www.lindtinquest.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/State%20Coroner%27s%20opening%20remarks%20made%20on%2018%20November%202015.pdf to http://www.lindtinquest.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/State%20Coroner%27s%20opening%20remarks%20made%20on%2018%20November%202015.pdf
• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151222105252/http://www.lindtinquest.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Media%20statement%20from%20the%20State%20Coroner%20of%20New%20South%20Wales%20-%2015%20December%202015.pdf to http://www.lindtinquest.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/Media%20statement%20from%20the%20State%20Coroner%20of%20New%20South%20Wales%20-%2015%20December%202015.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Bullet Fragments

This term is very misleading (Hence its use), bullet fragment does include whole bullets fired, which most of the shots (if not all) that hit hostages and killed a hostage would reasonably assumed to be. --Thelawlollol (talk) 01:49, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Findings?

The current article goes into exhaustive detail about what various witnesses said. But it says virtually nothing about the findings or conclusion of the inquest. cagliost (talk) 18:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Agreed. It's almost as if the case were swept under the rug.

There is a news article in 2019 (link) which says that there's a lawsuit against the police in the NSW District Court. There appears to have been numerous moments of poor communication leading up to / in addition to decisions of gross negligence and ultimately grave negligence. I hope some editors with more expertise on the subject can update these articles with more concrete resolutions, or updates on ongoing court cases. - JKVeganAbroad (talk) 07:11, 4 February 2024 (UTC)