Talk:Sydney Johnson/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sp33dyphil ^{Ready • to • Rumble} 02:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

• multiple letter of intent links.
  • fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• Please check for other multiple links - Penn, Baltimore Sun, The New York Times.
  • NYT and BS links only redundant in refs. Penn redundant through placeholder template.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:38, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• he was named Ivy League Player of the week, should that be placed in inverted commas since it's an honour - "Ivy League Player of the week"?
  • Never heard of that convention, but fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
    • No. That was a question. I thought that the honour was a proper noun, and that it should be capitalised and placed between inverted commas. I'm not insisting that you should do it. I was merely asking
      • I do not believe it is suppose to be in quotes. I never see it in press releases. I am going to undo.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:09, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• "rebuilding 'in which' it posted" --> 'during which'
  • fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:43, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• "2008-2009", add dash; check for other instances, like "2-4 start to win" and "13-14 with an 8-6 record"
  • fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• "While at Princeton, Johnson was a member of the Cap and Gown Club." - source?
  • Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:04, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• "Johnson has been very involved" --> replace has with had?
  • Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:49, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• format ref 75
  • fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• shouldn't Collegeinsider.com Coach of the Year be placed in inverted commas? And shouldn't the website be italicised?
  • No to the first and I don't believe so to the second.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:12, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• [1] yields 3 dead links
  • Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
• Source for "Head coaching record" table?
  • Refs added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 07:00, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Assessment

1. Well-written:

(a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and

(b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

2. Verifiable with no original research:

(a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline;

(b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); and

(c) it contains no original research.

3. Broad in its coverage:

(a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and

(b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:

(a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and

(b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.