This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is part of WikiProject Alternative music, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage of articles relating to alternative rock. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Alternative musicWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative musicTemplate:WikiProject Alternative musicAlternative music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Is it currently sideways? The UK Columbia issue of the CD is the version I have, and the text runs down the right-hand side, with the face looking up. The booklet itself opens on this side, and almost always on English language CDs that means that that side is meant to be facing right.--216.15.127.190 (talk) 02:03, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
@Ceoil:, your version of the lead runs rather short and cuts integral information regarding the producer and the sound of the album, which is stuff any good lead for an album should contain. Furthermore, calling the album 'more immediate' and 'less accessible' in the lead is no help to the reader. Seeing as you reverted my own revert without an edit summary has led me here.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 03:29, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Fine. I dont really care. Its great the article was expanded to such an extent today. Back listening to baseball....ps, are you David Brewis of The Kane Gang, or why the hell do you want that in the lead para. Ceoil (talk) 03:39, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I just thought identifying him as being in the Kane Gang in the lead would more readily help identify someone who doesn't have an article of themselves, though that's fine being introduced later in the article.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 03:49, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think so. There is a lot more to Paddy, the subject of the article, than once being vaguely associated with the Kane Gang. Ceoil (talk) 03:52, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose if you have something substantive to say you'll eventually say it. It takes a unique person to argue on a Prefab Sprout talk. Well done. None the less we now have great and engaging article, and I am bloody trilled. Ceoil (talk) 04:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Me too. There are worse things we could be arguing about, if its ok dude, lets start over. I am a *serious* prefab fan. I much prefer the fist album to the second. I'm getting that you do too, eeek. Ceoil (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I'm an early albums man myself, but it takes all sorts. Thanks for the edits yesterday, which were very good overall, and nice working with you; I think we can put the above behind us. Ceoil (talk) 10:37, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
