Jump to content

Talk:Swiss International Air Lines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge

[edit]

Should this page not be merged with the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swiss_International_Air_Lines_destinations page? Seems pointless keeping them seperate.82.26.43.105 09:21, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge 2

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was no consensus to merge, defaulting to leave as is --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 00:48, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose - There's no need to merge in Swiss European. It's a regional subsidiary, like Comair for Delta or American Eagle for American. Dbinder (talk) 02:18, 4 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ultra Strong Support It is a subsidiary fully owned by Swiss. It uses Swiss aircraft.It does not have a seperate CEO. It has a different ICAO code but it has the same IATA code. Unlike American Eagle at least one of the ICAO and IATA codes is equivalent to that of Swiss International Airlines. It has the same aircraft livery like Swiss. It does not even have a seperate website and not even an own section on Swiss's website. The luggage tags are the same. On the "fleet" section on the Swiss website all the planes are listed as part of Swiss. Swiss European airlines isn't even mentioned once as operating the Jumbolino's.(Avro RJ 85 or 100). The routes that SIAL flies are almost the same as those of SEAL. User:wwicki

[1])-"fleet" section on Swiss website.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

There should also be information about the star alliance logo on the aircraft and the logo's size. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.197.129.20 (talk) 00:51, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge 3

[edit]

Codeshare list

[edit]

The codeshare listing is quite a mouthful - is there any easy way to lean that up, or should it even be included in the present form? Any ideas? Jkstark 03:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Headquarters?

[edit]

I have a question, though I'm not sure whether it's worth addressing in the article. The Infobox mentions that the airline's headquarters are in Basel. Isn't this in a big office building at Basel/EuroAirport? If so, then aren't the headquarters technically in France? -- Gyrofrog (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The headquarters are not at the airport of Basel. I think they are in a building in the city. Wwicki 14:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Building is at Basel Airport. It is territorially in france, but I believe that there is an agreement regulating the issue... I'll check that when I'm home... if it's needed. Greetings from Big Boss 212.117.102.102 13:15, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Legally, the headquarters are in the City of Basel. I would have to check the shab.ch website to give you exact fact of that.... but now i'm ill... i'll leave that to another volounteer... ha.

  • The registered office is a place in the city of Basel, but the actual head office is on the grounds of EuroAirport, which is technically in France, but the Swiss HQ is on the Swiss side and must be accessed from Switzerland. WhisperToMe (talk) 05:11, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fleetsize

[edit]

Fleet size: 31 (7 on order)

Shouldn't that be 73 or am I missing somethings? Even If you didn't count Swiss European it would still be 49! --80.218.149.71 20:12, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Do you think it should be mentioned the SR technics Switzerland GMB should be mentioned as their main contractor? I currently work at a major vendor to EADS, BOEING, PW and many airlines. One of their planes were recently damaged i dont know what happened but i sent out a large amount of fuselage skin "T4 alclad panels" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.109.127.19 (talk) 02:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are problems with the seating capacity for the Airbus A32S; the business and economy seats do not add up to the totals.--Lbc71 (talk) 09:38, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese character on Swiss International tailfin

[edit]

What is the Chinese character on this Swiss tailfin? [2] WhisperToMe 19:57, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Swiss logo.png

[edit]

Image:Swiss logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:14, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The Star Alliance logo can be seen on the aircraft next to the cockpit. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.197.129.20 (talk) 00:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Swiss still has MD-11?

[edit]

They went to other operator ages ago. This is ages old and needs to be updated! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 192.33.98.130 (talk) 13:20, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Boeing 737-800

[edit]

In the table listing all aircraft, the Boeing 737-800 is listed with 25 (!) orders. However, I was unable to find any information about this elsewhere. Can someone please confirm that with a credible source? Additionally, the number of passengers seems way off with 189 for an all-business plane. I guess that should be 52 or 56. --TnTch (talk) 20:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

[edit]

http://mobile.swiss.com WhisperToMe (talk) 09:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Someone messed up the fleet table

[edit]

What should be below the fleet table is inside it and it messes it up and needs to be moved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.89.35.142 (talk) 01:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Swiss International Air Lines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:10, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Success! --1990'sguy (talk) 17:38, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Grouping together Swiss Intl Air Lines and Swiss Global Air Lines fleet

[edit]

Surely Swiss International Air Lines' and Swiss Global Air Lines' fleet should be grouped together? It makes more sense as both operate under the same name, livery and use the same website. It is also easier for the reader to read everything in one place. This grouping together would simply involve the addition of Swiss Global Air Lines' fleet on Swiss International Air Lines' fleet list. Csprime (talk) 13:27, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I understand, the Swiss Global aircraft are wet-leased to Swiss. WP:ALFC suggests for that situation, that they should not be included on the Swiss International fleet list, however it is not a binding guideline. I personally prefer not grouping them together, but I would accept it if that is the consensus. However I am strongly opposed to include only the Boeing 777 (as it is now); there is no reason to treat the 777 differently than other Swiss Global aircraft. Sure, they are owned by Swiss International, but so aresome of the RJ100 (3 of the remaining 5); what really matters is under which air operator's certificate they are operated, which is Swiss Global's. (Swiss Global actually doesn't own a single aircraft). Source: Swiss Aircraft Register of the Federal Office of Civil Aviation --Novarupta (talk) 22:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I personally would prefer to include all of Swiss Global's aircraft - it's easier for the reader to read. Csprime (talk) 12:34, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Swiss International Air Lines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:55, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Flag carrier/National Airline?

[edit]

The lede (still) states that Swiss is the "national airline"; the only reference supporting that is a link to a corporate page where they call themselves the "the airline of Switzerland". Until 2017 it said "flag carrier", and referred to an article calling Swiss the "de facto flag carrier". Flag carrier states that it is a "[carrier that] enjoys preferential rights or privileges accorded by the government". I could also assume that "national airline" could mean an airline that is to some degree owned by the government.

As far as I can see, none of this is true. No evidence is given that Swiss has any special privileges accorded by the government, and it is a subsidiary of Lufthansa. Of course Swiss styles themselves as "THE airline of Switzerland" and summon the legacy of old flag carrier Swissair. But this is marketing - nothing of this actually makes them a "national" carrier.

I'd just delete the note, but I'm a bit surprised that it was allowed to stand for years. So I wanted to ask here if there was any particular reason for that. --Averell (talk) 06:18, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None that I can see, certainly the concept of "flag carrier" (an airline with special rights) is no longer valid and it is probably true of "national airline" as it is not controlled or owned by the government. MilborneOne (talk) 10:30, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I changed this to "flag carrier" now. The respective article notes that a "flag carrier" may also be an airline with a strong connection to a state (as is the case here), and it does not imply a connection to a state in the way that "national airline" does. Averell (talk) 17:12, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. eviolite (talk) 04:38, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Head office location?

[edit]

Dear @Fonero: and @Uli Elch:

I notice you worked on the German Wiki version of the article extensively. I noticed that signage of SWISS was removed from the Basel Airport office (though the SWISS site indicates an office of the company is still there). I wonder if the primary head office (where the airline executive and top staff reside) has moved to Kloten, as SWISS now lists Kloten first. Are there any newspaper articles in German which document about how Crossair/SWISS has moved its head office from Basel Airport to Kloten?

Thank you, WhisperToMe (talk) 00:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Swiss_International_Air_Lines&oldid=1209912013"