Talk:Swinging Atwood's machine
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was move -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 12:27, 5 December 2006 (UTC) The title should be swapped to Swinging Atwood's machine (without parenthetical acronym and not a proper noun). Any objections to requesting a move? Femto 11:13, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Survey
[edit]Add "* Support" or "* Oppose" followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion with ~~~~
Discussion
[edit]Add any additional comments
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
How can anybody called the degree of freedom an engineer's terminology? Hello, have you heard of classical physics??!! Lagrange?Wishpippo (talk) 02:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC)