Talk:Swimming New Zealand

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Swimming Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Swimming, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Swimming on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwimmingWikipedia:WikiProject SwimmingTemplate:WikiProject Swimmingswimming articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Water polo work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because...This is the national sporting body of a major international sport. --DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 03:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

the article at the moment has one source and it is a self published website. the article fails WP:NRV, the organization is not notable just because it exists. WP:ORGSIG. if someone wants to put the article in their draft space, write a good article then publish it again, that would be appropriate. Jadeslair (talk) 04:12, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article has two source, one of which is completely independent. More can be found easily with a simple search. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 04:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We do not have to search, the sources need to be listed Jadeslair (talk) 05:04, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually @Jadeslair:, you are expected to search for additional sources before nominating an article for deletion. See WP:BEFORE, section D. That applies specifically to AfD, but a speedy deletion nomination on the grounds of notability should also check for sources.-gadfium 05:19, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well then I am sorry. I did not know about that rule. I normally do a quick search but not an in depth one. It seems I was hasty, Once again I am sorry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadeslair (talk • contribs) 13:11, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]