Talk:Sweets and Sour Marge/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 20:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Wikilink thirteenth season in lead
"The idea for the episode was pitched by Omine, who based on a lawsuit at the time, wherein smokers sued tobacco companies for selling harmful wares." I think there's a word missing
Unitalicize Motherloving Sweets and Sugar Company, and add quotation marks
Make sure sentences with quotes end with citations (like "According to Omine, the list "never ended," and when the writers ..." etc)
"At one point in the episode, the Springfield residents try to set the record or largest human pyramid, which fails when the pyramid collapses, causing the people to roll into a giant ball." I think a word is missing
"Despite the risk of redundancy, "Sweets" actually works..." Should be 'Sweets'
Decap refs 4, 6 and 11