Talk:Swedish heraldry

Swedish heraldry has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 3, 2009	Good article nominee	Not listed
July 17, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
February 23, 2012	Featured article candidate	Not promoted
September 22, 2024	Good article reassessment	Kept
Current status: Good article

Heraldry and vexillology

	Heraldry portal Swedish heraldry is within the scope of the Heraldry and vexillology WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of heraldry and vexillology. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Heraldry and vexillologyWikipedia:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyTemplate:WikiProject Heraldry and vexillologyheraldry and vexillology articles
	This was a selected article on the Heraldry and Vexillology Portal for September 2009.

Sweden Mid‑importance

	Sweden portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Talk Archive 1 • GA1 • GA2 • FA1 • Talk Archive 2

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Swedish heraldry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria because of numerous uncited statements throughout the article. Is anyone interested in addressing this, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Swedish heraldry

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: No consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:16, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are numerous uncited statements throughout the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see many; the article uses quite an idiosyncratic citation method which may have thrown you off. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:24, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.