Jump to content

Talk:Swastima Khadka

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSwastima Khadka has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 24, 2020Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 8, 2020.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Nepali actress Swastima Khadka holds a three-year diploma in architectural engineering?
On this day...A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 4, 2023.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk19:36, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

5x expanded by CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk). Self-nominated at 13:56, 19 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Five times expanded within time, neutrally written, well referenced, Earwig finds nothing except some quite long quoted passages, and the hook is cited from an online reliable source, QPQ done. It might be a good idea to prune the very long quotations a little, but I think not a DYK issue. Ready to go. Moonraker (talk) 14:37, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Swastima Khadka/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 09:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 09:52, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]
  • "Khadka debuted as an actress from the 2015 teen romance Hostel Returns," - in
  • "she appeared in 2017 romantic-drama" - appearance in the 2017
  • "which received positive reviews from the critics." - from critics will suffice
  • "In 2017," - That same year,
  • "which became commercially successful, the film grossed 60 million" - grossing 60 million

Personal and early life

[edit]
  • "She completed her School Leaving Certificate (SLC)" - the wikilink should be on the term School Leaving Ceritificate and the acroynms deleted since they are not mentioned again
  • "She told The Nepali Man that Miss Nepal was "a bit far-fetched for her". Khadka describes the experience as "a stepping stone" for her." - consider merging the two sentences together and shortening it accordingly
  • Please briefly explain who Nischal Basnet is for those who are not informed

2015–2017: Film debut

[edit]
  • "a girl whose childhood friend's love for her isn't reciprocated." - is not per MOS:CONTRACTION
  • "Her portrayal of Samriddhi was praised by critics, and one critic wrote," - repetition of the word "critic"
  • "Nepali Sansar wrote," - The reviewer for Nepali Sansar' wrote,
  • "but struggles with the International English Language Testing System (IELTS)" - you don't need the acroyns since they are not mentioned again in the article

2018–present: Nai Nabhannu La 5 and Bulbul

[edit]
  • "In the film, Khadka plays Ranjana, a teenage girl who shares a romance with Neer, played by debutant actor Abhisek Nepal." - the part she played is not explicitly mentioned by The Kathmandu Post but the Onlinekhabar source does. I suggest citation bundling
  • "(twenty million)" - 20
  • "Khadka then had a minor role in the film Chhakka Panja 3 (2018)" - later in the same year
  • "where[23] she played the role of a Brahmin girl who becomes the love interest of a Janajati boy.[23]" - the first use of Ref 23 is incorrectly positioned and also not needed
  • "Prakriti Kandel, writing for Nepali Times, praised her, writing:" - saying
  • "After Bulbul, Khadka appeared in Hajar Juni Samma (2019), and Ghamad Shere (2019)." - eliminate the years in parenthese and add the following to the end of this sentence in the same year
  • Delink Nishal Bashnet since he is already linked in another section

References

[edit]
  • References 7 and 24 should include the name of the language that the sources are written in
  • Reference 13: "2017 Nepali Music Bestseller: Kutu Ma Kutu – NepaliSansar"." - the text in bold is not needed

Am going to place the review on hold to allow the nominator to respond/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 14:51, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MWright96, All done. Thanks for the review. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 15:18, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]