Talk:Swan upping

This article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.River ThamesWikipedia:WikiProject River ThamesTemplate:WikiProject River ThamesRiver Thames articles

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Birds Low‑importance

Swan upping is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Birds To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea (more)
Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath (more)
Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon (more)
Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria (more)
NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital (more)
Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl (more)
Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration (more)
Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling (more)
Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations (more)
Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos (search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles.

More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo.

(The) Swan with Two Nicks

Not all such pubs have had their name corrupted to "...Necks". There's a "Swan With Two Nicks" (no "the") in Worcester, for example. 86.136.255.33 00:47, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page title

What's with the capital U in the page title? The OED has "swan-upping" (see http://www.askoxford.com/concise_oed/swanupping?view=uk), so this should be the page title (and the page contents should follow suit). [A search in onelook.com] confirms this, and shows Wikipedia to be the only listed online reference work that thinks differently. — Paul G (talk) 16:00, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The official website of the British Monarchy spells it Swan Upping[1] Rakerman (talk) 02:19, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apocryphal history

This could do with some more research. The 12th-century claim is rather unsubstantiated. The 1482 charter exists, but all it does is complaining that everyone is marking swans illegally, and therefore restricting the right to mark swans to rich land-owners. Swans marked by others are to be seized, and half of the swans so seized are to be given to the king. That's it, no claim concerning "all unmarked swans on open waters" or similar, and no Vintners or Dyers. I assume more information could be found in Ticehurst (1957), but it's only available via snipped view on google books. In any case the internet is full of false information on this, which is aimlessly copy-pasted around. I am sure the BBC News got the "900-years history" from Wikipedia, and we are now using that as a source for Wikipedia. This is why we cannot use journalism for references: journalists have learned to google, but they do not care to get it right, they just take whatever sounds good to them and move on. --dab (𒁳) 08:17, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]