Talk:Suzanne Nossel

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Retracting changes?

I would like to retract the changes that I made to the wikipedia page of Suzanne Nossel. I no longer support these edits. Is there any way to return to the articles previous form? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Humanrightsforall (talk • contribs) 19:26, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted the article back to the previous version. January (talk) 21:14, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed sections

Material removed at this diff did have some problems of context, sourcing and POV language. However, much of it can be put back once there is proper referencing and better overall context. Below I'll put some sources and how they can be used and hopefully get back and rewrite it if no one beats me too it.

Some useful sources, though note that generally we let other reliable sources decide what are the most note worthy of her articles to describe, they can also be linked in articles. Statements she's made quoted by sources not likely to lie or be inaccurate generally can be used too. Searching books.google or news.google or general search or Highbeam or other sources with her name and the term or activity or position you want more info about is best way to bring up information. Life and work:

Nossel’s comments on her early life here are proper early in article - but without editorial comments; she states her positions on a variety of issues in that interview and this one.
About appointment to one of her positions

Mentions in interviews or by others of her Positions/Views/Publications:

Her works that can be listed:

Controversies:

Info that perhaps can be integrated, along with Hedges interview. May end up being debated. Better sources always preferable: About Hedges resignation from PEN; Mondoweiss has an overview and may have some good links that are WP:RS

CarolMooreDC🗽 02:00, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The information that was removed should be restored because it shows the anti-Semitism and hypocrisy of the so-called peace/anti-Israel movement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.152.156.214 (talk) 02:57, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

People will interpret material in different ways depending on their existing point of view. What matters it is consistent with Wikipedia policies. CarolMooreDC🗽 03:21, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable Sentence

[I read the talk page guidelines, but I'm new to this. I am trying to comply.] Under "Controversy," the sentence "In fact, however, Nossel opposed the Iraq War and Hedges was not able to cite evidence that she supported it" seems inappropriate. It claims Hedges has no citable evidence, and yet claims that "Nossel opposed the Iraq War" without citing any evidence. Also, the claim that Hedges was unable to cite evidence is, itself, uncited. The sentence does not seem to meet encyclopedic standards, and would be better removed. A citation for the claims would probably make it appropriate. --75.80.98.75 (talk) 23:33, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of personal life info

I removed some unsourced material about Nossel's heritage until citations can be provided. --Malerooster (talk) 21:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]