Jump to content

Talk:Suzanne La Follette

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Does anyone want to clean this up? I'll do it if I have time, but I know nothing about it. It sounds kind of interesting and important, otherwise I would suggest that it was simply deleted. --Apyule 07:21, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

O.K. I cleaned it up and converted it into a stub with a usefull link. Now it would be great if it was expanded into an article. --Apyule 07:40, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Thank you. - Nat Krause 09:44, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Glad i didn't see it before! [smile] More in progress.
--Jerzy·t 16:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

If La Follette family gets created, someone should activate the commented lk i left.
--Jerzy·t 16:51, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Conservative of Libertarian?

[edit]

I see this says she was a conservative journalist, although according to this site, she was a libertarian feminist. Which was it?

Allixpeeke


La Follette was never a conservative, always a libertarian. See Presley article at http://alf.org/papers/LaFollette.shtml

The appropriate citations have been added to article.

Emmaspooner (talk) 02:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Suzanne La Follette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]