Talk:Sutherland railway station

Australia: Sydney / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Sutherland railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

Number of services

By all means lets count the number of services and get it right in the article, but this edit, just either contradicts or repeats the info in the previous para. --Inas66 (talk) 03:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does it really matter exactly how may services stop at a station? It changes every timetable revision and will get out of date very quickly.

MrHarper (talk) 03:57, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not listing the info at all is a completely valid thing to do, if that is the general consensus, I would support it. WP is not going to be a timetable site. But, if we are going to list it, then we may as well be specific and accurate. After all, saying there are 5-7 services per hour is going to need to be updated next time there is a timetable update the same as a few sentences outlining peak/off-peak suburban/interurban frequencies is going to be. --Inas66 (talk) 04:30, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]