Talk:Suspense Digest

This article was nominated for deletion on 2008-02-06. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

I agree with merging Devta here. Neither article has sufficient sources to establish importance anyway. Guy (Help!) 09:44, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think Devta deserves to be merged into the Suspense Digest article because it is a unique phenomenon in the history of story-telling. I personally adore the story as it is the most engaging story I have ever read and despite the length it has always been the jewel of Suspense Digest. Moreover most of the nineteenth cetury novels that we have in book forms today were also serialised in different digests/megazines of their time but the stories are now known for their own individual merit. So I think the idea of merging the two articles is basically flawed. Tahir Ali Khan February 22, 2009 from Aberdeen Scotland.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.131.212.20 (talk • contribs) 09:38, February 22, 2009 (UTC)