This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Jonstonewrites I contested the PROD based on the subject not wanting to have the article because: she is a notable person.
The two revisions in the PROD box read
"subject of BLP wishes to have article deleted as keeping it up-to-date and accurate is too difficult for them" -- she shouldn't be editing her own Wikipedia article.
"subject of BLP wishes to have article deleted as inaccuracies make it less helpful for people looking for information with other resources available" -- the Wikipedia article effectively not being good for marketing Mallery is not a reason for having the article deleted; I don't know what inaccuracies there are -- unless she has a different number of cats, poodle, husband, or bestsellers.
Given its current state, I don't blame her for disliking the article. But it can be improved. As the creator of a number of articles about contemporary writers and someone who is not unfamiliar with her work, I am aware she's not only notable, but, given her popularity, she's rather essential to the Women Writers WikiProject and would be an undertaking for the Women in Red WikiProject. I am going to have a busy few weeks, but I can make a number of improvements to the article this week and in a few weeks after that. Don't nominate for deletion yet. Thank you. DiamondRemley39 (talk) 12:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}