Talk:Susan Hefuna

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women artists

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (it is a page of a public person and artist, just like other artists > see damien hirst, gerhard richter, ... within the art world you cannot talk about promotion because it is ART or would you consider that if you go to a museum you are looking at promotional advertising ? I think not! ) --Eps51 (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --83.244.237.75 (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Hefuna is not only already mentioned in several entries already on Wikipedia, but I feel that it is unfair to describe the clearly laid out and scrupulously researched and accurate text as "promotional". In what sense is it more promotional than any of the other entries on living artists, such as Damien Hirst's, say? As to further suitability for her inclusion, she is mid-career and already in the collections of several important museums around the world and has had several international exhibitions of note.

One comment was that the references should be interwoven in the text itself, but your own editorial procedures insist that references appear clearly marked in their own section.

I am rather confused by what seem like highly subjective criteria for deleting entries.

83.244.237.75 (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)LondonEditorial83.244.237.75 (talk) 18:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Text such as :

Her German and Egyptian heritage and personal experiences inform her multilayered works, which aim to build bridges between cultures and reflect their differing traditions and peculiarities. Exploring cross-cultural codes, Hefuna constantly plays with what images mean and how they function, creating dream-like spaces to which viewers can attach a wide array of significance.

can only be interpreted as promotional. This is not language that actually informs me about her art; rather it is language that entices me to experience her art. This is not the purpose of Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 18:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

She is clearly notable as an artist and as such we should have an article about her. I've quickly tidied up the article to save it from being deleted. I think Eps51 is a little confused by our referencing system - if they can go back and add inline references to show which information came from where it would be very helpful. SmartSE (talk) 21:51, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]