Talk:Survivor Series (1993)/GA1

GA Review

Hi, I will be reviewing this article for GA. I feel that I cut my teeth on the first wrestling article of yours and will have much less trouble with this one. All in all, it looks very good.

• Sorry I wikilinked kayfabe in your article. Even though I did a search, I did not find that you had already linked it above. It may not be harmful to have some of these obscure (to me) wrestling terms wikilinked more than once.
  • Makes sense, instead of expecting the reader to go back to find the wikilink. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
• I am wondering if sharpshooter should be capitalized as in the body of the article it is capitalized, but in the chart below it is not.
  • It is always capitalized on the WWE website, so I capitalized it in the chart. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
• Perhaps you should mention in the lead that this was thought to be the most boring wrestling event ever, as that seems distinctive.
  • I added some information about the reception. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I will add more comments after I read through it more. —Mattisse (Talk) 23:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)

• "writing for 411mania.com" - shouldn't the name of a website be in italics?
  • Done. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
• It might be helpful to shorten the size of some of the long paragraphs for readability. For example, the first paragraph under Background could be split in two.
  • I split up some of the longer paragraphs in the background section. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing the article. I look forward to any further comments or suggestions, as you have been very helpful with both articles. GaryColemanFan (talk) 21:48, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Final GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

—Mattisse (Talk) 23:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)