Jump to content

Talk:Survivor Philippines

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeSurvivor Philippines was a Media and drama good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 27, 2012Good article nomineeNot listed

More needed

[edit]

This is a good start but can we find more information so we can eventually have a seperate page for each season.--Cooly123 00:07, 20 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cooly123 (talkcontribs)

Actually, there is a separate page of each season. You just didn't read them. - 上村七美 (Nanami-chan) | talkback | contribs 01:48, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Survivor Philippines/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 16:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article shortly. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the issues I found:

  • "originally based from the show," based on the show, plus no comma needed there.
  • 'region.[1]." rm second period.
  • A good amount of information in the lead isn't elsewhere in the article; the lead is meant to be a summary. For example, the cash prize appears nowhere else, and for that matter should be cited.
  • "would not be enough to satisfy the diversity of personalities to be involved" a bit confused as to what this means, could it be clarified especially since they went to 16 the next season?
  • The winners' names don't need to be bolded.
  • The Deviations section is almost completely unsourced.
  • Quite a few articles need publishers and access dates.
  • Most concerning is that there's little meat in the article. There's little about how the game is played (more besides just "all elements of the Survivor franchise were otherwise present."), results, the concept and creation, and most importantly critical reception.

Given the last point in particular combined with the other issues, the article needs a major amount of work to be a GA, so I'm failing it at this time. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 17:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Survivor Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:55, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]